Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 16:04:01 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Smith A. Cat" <imbe AT primenet DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Size of executable too large.
In-Reply-To: <338CF8C3.1F2F@primenet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970601160327.24182C@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On 28 May 1997, Smith A. Cat wrote:

> > I compiled a 699-byte file and got a 140KB executable. This led to look
> > at the FAQ files. The FAQ mentions two possible remedies for the size
> > problem. The -s switch brought the executable's size down to 68KB. The
> > other option stated: etc. etc. etc...
> 
> this same post appears SO many times, maybe the faq should just say:

The FAQ already says this, and this particular poster has even read
it.  I fail to see how saying it in other words will prevent these
messages from being posted.