From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: testing uclock()
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 20:18:59 +0000
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <336657B3.35AA@cs.com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970427115144 DOT 17804G-100000 AT is> <336996be DOT 1979253 AT news DOT uni-duisburg DOT de>
Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp107.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

(oops!  this may have been posted twice - sorry!  ;)

Michael Mauch wrote:
> 
> > Note that `printf' cannot print a value of type `uclock_t', even though
> > it is an integer value, because it is a 64-bit integer.
> 
> Can't we just use "%lld" to printf() values of type long long int or uclock_t?
> Am I missing something here?

It's possible that the docs weren't updated since the upgrade to DJGPP
v2.01, where long long ints are supported in both _doprnt and _doscan.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I  |     mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com     |
| Plan:  To find ANYONE willing to |   http://www.cs.com/fighteer   |
| play Descent 2 on DWANGO!        | Tagline: <this space for rent> |
---------------------------------------------------------------------