Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 14:13:22 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Gurunandan R. Bhat" <grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: A Suggestion.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970408001152.3779A-100000@aditya.unigoa.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970408141258.1046T-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Gurunandan R. Bhat wrote:

> 		i have a small suggestion for the consideration of this 
> group: would it be possible to include the texinfo sources of the 
> documentation of a package with the binaries.

I'm not sure if this is a good idea.  It will certainly make the
binary zips larger (.texi files tend to be large), and thus punish the
majority of users who don't print the docs.  IMHO, some of the binary
zips are already too large.

If you don't mind the quality of the printed docs, you could run a
filter program on the .info files to remove the node markers, and then
print the ASCII text that's left.