From: waage AT brainerd DOT net (Moses)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Question about RHIDE and EMACS
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 08:14:26 GMT
Organization: MEANS
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <332908b4.14769194@news.polaristel.net>
References: <3326A877 DOT 3617 AT rtp DOT gtegsc DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ascend1-13.brainerd.net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On the date of Wed, 12 Mar 1997 12:58:31 GMT, David McKee
<david DOT mckee AT rtp DOT gtegsc DOT com> wrote:

>I have recently installed the full C/C++ distribution of djgpp
>on my pc and I must first say "Bravo!".  
>
>I was wondering if anyone had any specific technical opinions 
>on which development environment was "better".  I have recently 
>learned xemacs on my SUN workstation at work and love it.  Still,
>if RHIDE is easy and integrated and intuitive, I certainly would
>like to know.  Thank you in advance.

RHIDE is just like Borlands Turbo C IDE... its pretty easy to use I
think.

>
>-- David T. McKee: 
>-- Think: Innovative Science Learning Systems
>--                 Physics, Electrical Science, Computer
>--                 Science, Natural Science, Theology
>======================Signature Block====================
>It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; To search out
>a matter is the glory of kings.  Pr 25:2
>---------------------------------------------------------
>There is nothing so sacred as it cannot be looked into...
>=========================================================


Moses -- Apocalypse Software