From: Tudor Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: R-M Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 22:09:15 -0800 Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal Lines: 28 Message-ID: <3322540B.64DE@cam.org> References: <19970306 DOT 175707 DOT 9655 DOT 2 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com> Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org NNTP-Posting-Host: dynppp-208.hip.cam.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Benjamin D Chambers wrote: > > I've thought about it for a few days, and I'll have to cast my vote this > way: > Split the group/mailing list. > > As in, we'd have djgpp-questions (or something), and djgpp-ramblings (I > don't like the -wizards idea, cause I know I'd subscribe and I know I'm > not a wizard :). > The questions one would be for anyone who needs help, and the ramblings > one would just be ramblings about anything people post (similar to the > way they do now, just now they'd have their own list and wouldn't bother > people who aren't interested in such threads). > > As usual, any questions/comments/flames appreciated. I didn't follow the thread, but I have to ask a question: WHY? Why do you want to split or moderate c.o.m.d ?I mean,yes, there are some kinda-off-topic threads, but c.o.m.d is still quite quiet.It's not like comp.lang.asm.x86 or anything... Now if that Scott Nudds would come to this newsgroup YES I think c.o.m.d should be moderated so it is not transformed into something like comp.lang.c. But untill then... (I actually hope that will never happen) > ..Chambers -- tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org http://www.cam.org/~tudor 'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'