Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 00:01:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Phelps <morphine AT hops DOT cs DOT jhu DOT edu>
To: Cristovao Braga <cbraga AT datasoft DOT com DOT br>
cc: djgpp list <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: c.o.m.djgpp retro-moderated?
In-Reply-To: <B0000045197@datasoft.datasoft.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970306000003.21399B-100000@hops.cs.jhu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Cristovao Braga wrote:

> 
> While reading all the messages about moderation, something sprung to my
> mind. Does the undesired mail mostly come from Usenet or is there an even
> balance between it and the mailing list?
> 
> I think people in the mailing list are less-likely to post undesirable mail
> since we get our mailboxes full and it takes a while to read through so
> many messages. If indeed those posts come mostly from Usenet, I'd favour
> stopping the gateway between the two.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  I strongly vote _NO_ for this, as I am on the mailing list and I receive
a lot of good responses that come from the newsgroup.  Making them two
independent DJGPP resources is somewhat self-defeating.  Or perhaps this
isn't what you meant?


> 
> Has anyone got more information?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Cristovao Braga
> cbraga AT datasoft DOT com DOT br
> 



						---Michael Phelps
						   morphine AT cs DOT jhu DOT edu


                               CH3
                               |
                               N
                             / |
                     ______/   |
                    /      \   CH2
             _____/         \__|__      
           //     \\        /  |  \\     
         //        \\______/___CH2 \\  
          \        /       \       /
           \______/         \_____/
          / ------ \       /      \
        OH           \   /         OH
                       O
 
                   Morphine