From: leathm AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au (Leath Muller)
Message-Id: <199703042356.JAA11735@solwarra.gbrmpa.gov.au>
Subject: Re: OpenGL ----> Allegro
To: r DOT humphris AT indigo-avs DOT com (Robert Humphris)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:56:20 +1000 (EST)
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz, fighteer AT cs DOT com
In-Reply-To: <c=GB%a=_%p=Indigo_Active_Vi%l=CRIANLARICH-970304103505Z-28@crianlarich.Indigo> from "Robert Humphris" at Mar 4, 97 10:35:05 am
Content-Type: text

> Come to think of it, what has OpenGL got that Allegro hasn't? Should we
> not try to implement these features
> in Allegro making it more powerful still?

Ummm, sorry, have you used OpenGL??? It has so much stuff that Allegro
doesn't that it borders on scary. And OpenGL 1.1 just added a heap of new
stuff.

I suggest going to www.sgi.com and having a look around. Also, have a look
at the man pages on OpenGL and see how much work needs to be done... :)

Oh, and a last note, I don't use Allegro. If I am going to code for OpenGL,
I would prefer a seperate module completely...  :)

Leathal.