From: Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: nasm or ta2as
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 17:50:02 -0800
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <32F14FCA.6704@cam.org>
References: <149EBFF5985 AT tvi_mail DOT tvi DOT cc DOT nm DOT us>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynppp-89.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

David May wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> > unfortunately, nasm appears
> > to no longer be maintained (looks like the project just died of death :( and ta2as works in part but throws up all number of errors. the biggest problem is that parts of
> > the code are 486 and 586 specific and it complains 'not a 386 instruction' or something similar. it also throws up a whole buttload of errors at various points eg. LOCAL, .286, .MODEL LARGE and such
> >
> > regards,
> > nik
> I just got version 0.92 a few days ago; the changes file indicates
> that the developer put out the new version in Jan, 1992.  Looks like
> he is supporting it to me.  :-)
Is this a joke I don't get?
I have version 0.90 which was updated around october 96.
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'