From: afn03257 AT freenet3 DOT afn DOT org (Daniel P Hudson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP vs Borland C++
Date: 28 Jan 1997 12:33:12 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <5ckrm8$51m@huron.eel.ufl.edu>
References: <5c1qik$9sh AT lion DOT cs DOT latrobe DOT edu DOT au> <32E98087 DOT 6A50 AT cs DOT com> <5ch8gs$qps AT huron DOT eel DOT ufl DOT edu>
 <32ee2f98 DOT 4110272 AT news DOT primenet DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet3.afn.org
NNTP-Posting-User: afn03257
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

libolt AT goodnet DOT com (Mike McLean) wrote:
>[SNIP]
>>
>> Point in hand, Borland C++ targets DOS16, DOS32, WIN3x, WIN95, OS/2,
>> and NT while GCC targets DOS32 only. Therefore Borland has a lot more

>if you consider EMX, and Cygnus GNU-Win32 then GCC targets Dos32,
>Win32, and OS/2 on the PC.  Not to mention the other systems GCC runs
>on

>just my 2 cents :)

My mistake, GCC under DJGPP targets DOS32, but extensions for OS/2,
windows, etc. are available, however, that brings in even more bugs
to the total system. Yes, GCC targets Unices, VMS, etc. only us,
DJGPP, users have to do a little re-coding. ;-) I'd hate to see what
EMX had to go through.