From: <SANDMANN AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Access to more memory
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997  9:25:28
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <32e88008.SANDMANN@clio.rice.edu>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970123165604 DOT 562N-100000 AT is> <5c92n2$cq8 AT newton DOT pacific DOT net DOT sg>
Reply-To: SANDMANN AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> In that case, do you have any idea, if CWSDPMI is still in development
> (and if there are plans to make it support more than 128 Mb of RAM).

I have no plans at this point to make further changes to CWSDPMI (there
are no confirmed bugs that I know of, and the missing feature set is small,
and there are easy workarounds for those).  And I don't use DOS anymore.

The code can be re-compiled (with a change in dalloc.h) to support up to 
2Gb of virtual memory (if you have that much disk).  This will greatly
increase the resident size of the executing CWSDPMI image (potentially to
the point where the small model breaks).

I did do some testing almost 2 years ago with 512Mb of memory configured,
and it seemed to run OK, but I didn't have that much time to test it 
rigorously (512Mb on a 16Mb machine is S L O W . . .)