Message-Id: <199701231112.AA06222@crete.csd.uch.gr>
Organization: University of Crete, Dept. of Computer Science,
	P.O.Box 1470, Heraklio, Crete, GR-71110  GREECE
	tel: +30(81)210057, fax: +30(81)210012, tlx: 262389 CCI
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GDB and static variables 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:04:26 +0200."
             <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970123090202 DOT 3044K-100000 AT is> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:10:44 +0200
From: &akis Nikolaos  <komod AT csd DOT uch DOT gr>


Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>Does the same happen if you compile without -m486?  Maybe that switch 
>causes gcc to optimize the code, whereby it's OK if the code isn't 
>exactly like the source.

I had the same problems with gdb and static variables.
The problem remains whether you compile with or without the option -m486.