From: mwood AT indyvax DOT iupui DOT edu (Mark H. Wood) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is DJGPP just as good as Borland C++ Message-ID: <1997Jan21.143102.27719@indyvax.iupui.edu> Date: 21 Jan 97 14:31:02 -0500 References: Lines: 40 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp In article , Andrew Deren writes: > Get Borland C++ 5.0 or VC++ (v?) or even Visual Basic. Nah. Use RSXNTDJ. Find it in the same place you got DJGPP. It makes console or GUI app.s with equal ease. (There are some bugs in the ancillary tools, and you can't link .DLLs yet, but under '95 you only need to break up into .DLLs to share object code between app.s, not for memory management (mis)reasons.) You still use DJGPP to compile the code, but you link it with the RSXNT libraries and pass the object through a gadget that converts it to MS COFF and decorates it with all the stuff that Win95 expects to see. > On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Alan Wilson wrote: > >> At 09:40 PM 1/17/97 -0800, you wrote: >> >Alan Wilson wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks for the info. I definitely want to learn to write large programs >> >> with graphics. I can use DJGPP to write good graphical Win 95 programs >> right? >> > >> >Sorry, but no. DJGPP does not produce Windows 95 code. The programs >> >you write with DJGPP will run under Win95 since Win95 provides a DPMI >> >environment (which DJGPP requires), but the resulting programs are still >> >DOS programs. >> > >> >> I see. So what do I use if I wanted to write Win 95 programs? If not >> DJGPP, than what? >> >> Alan Wilson >> >> >> > -- Mark H. Wood, Lead Systems Programmer +1 317 274 0749 [@disclaimer@] MWOOD AT INDYVAX DOT IUPUI DOT EDU Finger for more information. I am endeavoring to construct a mnemonic circuit using stone knives and bearskins. -- Spock