Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 20:05:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Peter van Sebille cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: OpenDOS to be released next week! In-Reply-To: <32E3364D.492D@nlrtdfsc.origin.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Peter van Sebille wrote: > root wrote: > > > > On Thu, 16 Jan 1997, Gene Buckle wrote: > > > > > > ones, (FAT32 yukkk!!, VFAT, NTFS). A better thing would be to incorporate > > > > the Linux second extended filesystem into OpenDOS. That would be cool > > > > indeed. Of course it wouldn't work with legacy apps, but some kludging > > > > could be done about that. > > > Well Mike, you'll have the source soon enough, so better get to spec'ing > > > it out. ;) > > > > Naw, I'll wait and see what others decide to do. I'm sure I'll > > like what comes out whatever it is. > > A year ago I wrote a TSR to transparently mount Linux' ext2fs. Right > know > I'm working on a Win 95 FSD to do the same thing. If I'm in a good mood > I could repeat the trick one more time for OpenDos. I'll think about > it, seems like fun. > > I'm quite anxious to get a hold on the source, just to see what it is. Yeah, I'm anxious to get the sources too. I really like the sound of your plans! I think it would be too cool to have Linux long filenames in DOS. Both for read and write of course. Only new apps that are ext2fs aware would be allowed to use the fs routines though. Also, I think I'd like NO disk caching going on on those drives in case DOS locks up. Actually read caching is ok. I disable write caching in DOS all the time anyways. Well, TTYL Mike A. Harris http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris My dynamic address: http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT sympatico DOT ca mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca