From: korpela AT islay DOT ssl DOT berkeley DOT edu (Eric J. Korpela)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Another aspect of free() ?
Date: 10 Jan 1997 18:52:35 GMT
Organization: Cal Berkeley-- Space Sciences Lab
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <5b635j$258@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <199701090726 DOT KAA00800 AT marstu DOT mari DOT su> <32D4B22D DOT 54F9 AT post DOT comstar DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: islay.ssl.berkeley.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <32D4B22D DOT 54F9 AT post DOT comstar DOT ru>,
Dim Zegebart  <zager AT post DOT comstar DOT ru> wrote:
>If argument for FREE eq NULL you get the problem. :-(
>Instead XFREE correctly process NULL value. 

Why not use "if (p) free(p);"?  It's guaranteed to work.

Eric

-- 
Eric Korpela                        |  An object at rest can never be
korpela AT ssl DOT berkeley DOT edu            |  stopped.
<a href="http://www.cs.indiana.edu/finger/mofo.ssl.berkeley.edu/korpela/w">
Click here for more info.</a>