X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4vH6VV7bpdyFEaJJcsIOMM6zZpgkI/0FeGM97BSWvvs=; b=k/dc+IsluW/Wdtt2yiOyKUaD/+WXQ/xaNbRK6fQmtqXVdz3FXYuUcnukQijDHsF3W+ 5v3LEnk9KUPbQQ8eRjEYZGo1P3Fap1y31NzX9PkjwRWQ9rgwO8OCRFHGaCg+HWJlN/z8 qpFa5nxzujnJ3Yu1JkFhcJtALeTULstfnOiSHh+j4HGS49t7D3bA3L8rdpki3rXkWHXS s54S8Po6De1C+USCjQ5E6/jTrrxdS+haB9s1T/ahSfCaX3DvGaDtEY92V83A7suuxdq5 A7Viu3q+/SS0c6s6y9KYToebEm3qfVLYBsFDuRge2Rq0408ohHBxHbwv2xUIlQgYIOD4 mOwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4vH6VV7bpdyFEaJJcsIOMM6zZpgkI/0FeGM97BSWvvs=; b=dSvPK8fjm6Bh3BoPLYzhQ8TMY5zOdmIV1Sso0cjJ3fMys/f8INb2RCWMzQ4PpfgEIh bdDPx92/4/ZK8ya2+76RoLU55zymLNqjmlIL8d1C6szbMNBXkd/s6Rfa5J0pjHZrCoVb CraCZLpEGRtollrmpLX5qtRdHY4/yxKjaBMgOsdJeNvgr1y+5mBiHo1elAU3aXEFVIyH z0bpzzy/dvVucJmNgVZ3V8AnHALqJZmfLUuO0Qme/Q82ZU8YSVNT9xawvuZS+aJ3lEkE i0lJdj6LcXX2vU+gYAoxYsBZuyND+dP3tBf+aSmrcG1f500khlHbNgcJcywzstw/703f mz8A== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Dhl3nB9Ish9JRs0MkfjiCP6Z1qTj4gDAtr21R5XA3gcKp85cM6 UmTzSjVVpeXKUsRO64/OJc+ptTljcpISmJNMaMXqgG0l X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYo3bVahOvV80cRY2VNNFsLvnAMSOvSVAKJa+7WhJ7woTqc0zgF8YTnWVUODQKuQaU+k217J9xuJHoldKFhviI= X-Received: by 2002:a24:17d2:: with SMTP id 201-v6mr3848552ith.0.1536951506666; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:58:26 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: stdbool.h To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Why do we need to provide a stdbool.h among djgpp includes? Gcc >= 3.0 already provides it, and looking at deleted/v2gnu/ our own gcc302b.zip and gcc31b.zip do have it. (And the more recent versions gcc packages from current/v2gnu/ have it too, of course.) That makes our stdbool.h only useful for gcc2.95, but it is broken for it, because gcc2.95 does not define the _Bool type which we rely upon. (I don't know about the gcc2.95 C++ bool support, so I don't know whether our stdbool.h works with it.) I suggest we either remove it, or adjust it in a way so it only defines stuff for gcc < 3.0. Maybe (?) something like: diff -U 5 -r1.3 stdbool.h --- stdbool.h 2 May 2015 07:31:48 -0000 1.3 +++ stdbool.h 14 Sep 2018 18:52:36 -0000 @@ -1,15 +1,20 @@ /* Copyright (C) 2012 DJ Delorie, see COPYING.DJ for details */ #ifndef __dj_stdbool__h_ #define __dj_stdbool__h_ +#if (__GNUC__ < 3) +#include_next +#else + #if (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) \ || !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || defined(__cplusplus) #define bool _Bool #define true 1 #define false 0 #define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1 #endif /* (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) || !__STRICT_ANSI__ */ +#endif /* (__GNUC__ < 3) */ #endif /* !__dj_stdbool__h_ */ Comments? I am writing this, because I just attempted building current cvs using gcc-2.95 and it failed in src/libc/dos/io/_open.c which added stdbool.h dependency in revision 1.13. The failure is unrecognized type _Bool,of course. For it, I suggest the following (like doprnt.c): diff -u -r1.13 _open.c --- _open.c 19 May 2018 18:01:03 -0000 1.13 +++ _open.c 14 Sep 2018 18:57:21 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ /* Copyright (C) 1995 DJ Delorie, see COPYING.DJ for details */ #include #include -#include #include #include #include @@ -19,6 +18,10 @@ #include #include +typedef enum { + false = 0, true = 1 +} bool; + int _open(const char* filename, int oflag) { OK to apply? -- O.S.