X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5353CE51.2010801@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:40:33 +0200 From: Juan Manuel Guerrero User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-4.9.0 20140411 snapshot for DJGPP References: <53492C99 DOT 7090109 AT iki DOT fi> In-Reply-To: <53492C99.7090109@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cpRmA5kY4ydqth+jLKPKsNE2v2I3qm6Z5TgEO/mmB4Kjs0V588I sI1+qfRTXCtmmiStj9Vqxak2VoJuuLgqkhNlRBdpdyI8ZqdABKmGJC3uCPYUHbS641bBwqy SBjEjKz43sftCHE4cegqR0mX3gWpE5ImEdm0M0vDpq3fjends1EdDkI+lum0PwDNaw1h+9B lttP0KXwelMw5DeDAI/9Q== Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Am 12.04.2014 14:07, schrieb Andris Pavenis: > Yesterday gcc-4_9-branch was created and gcc-4.9.0 prerelease > was made available. That means that actual gcc-4.9.0 is near: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-04/msg00091.html > > My build of snapshot from gcc-4_9-branch is available at > > http://ap1.pp.fi/djgpp/gcc/test/4.9.0-20140411/ > > I did some testing for C++: > - built cln-1.3.2 and run its test. All works out of box as earlier > - built GiNaC (www.ginac.de). Builds out of box. Some tests seem > to run extremely slowly. I suspect that DJGPP v2.04 slow free() is biting. > > Of course it bootstraps OK (except of getting stuck once while > configuring libstdc++-v3: it happens randomly in the same place > when building under Windows Vista, I do not know why). > > About DJGPP v2.04 slow free(): I have used nmalloc for building gcc > already for a long time as gcc allocates and frees large number of > memory blocks and DJGPP v2.04 own memory management is too slow. > > Perhaps it could be time use nmalloc for DJGPP libc. > > Andris > Have you ever managed to merge nmalloc into your local CVS repository? IIRC I have tried a year ago but I failed. I did not really understood how djgpp's malloc worked and I also did not understood how nmalloc worked so it was impossible to me to replace one with the other and I gave up. If you have merged the code you can send me a patch and I will try the nmalloc changes with some code of mine. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero