X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 00:41:16 -0400
Message-Id: <E1QuzqW-0000sK-FT@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<CAA-ihx9cK=hixLEsdRO1W+1KwP0EyXa1WisanS8aPbsRkt0a1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	(message from Rugxulo on Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:10:42 -0500)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix cabs and cabsf build failure with gcc-4.4, test results
References: <CAA2C=vCABbghMEVV2Hss+eXcmkFxuHA+dE6+Nc+-yzw-cHv1YA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vBLXmFb9Pu7nmivBhiOGs=VghZ8f90CvcAk+ijV3+Cq+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vAjAgCxQqu1bJGE05Rbjd+6b7z_2xKZ=YHYfsKr5uKptQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83ty9c453p DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA-ihx9cK=hixLEsdRO1W+1KwP0EyXa1WisanS8aPbsRkt0a1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:10:42 -0500
> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> 
>    I'm the worst person to comment on this, but ... if __STDC__ means
> ANSI/ISO C89/C90/C99, then lacking that, K&R C won't have _Complex
> (C99) keyword anyways.

_Complex is a GCC extension, so it's always available.  I don't know
if someone can define _Complex in another compiler or undef __STDC__
with GCC (with some std= switch), but I don't like gratuitous changes
in someone else's code.