X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pruning current
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:01:56 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <200503311308 DOT j2VD83Fa017915 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200504011134 DOT 55232 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <01c536be$Blat.v2.4$c9706680 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
In-Reply-To: <01c536be$Blat.v2.4$c9706680@zahav.net.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200504011902.08894.pavenis@latnet.lv>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fgi.fi
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Friday 01 April 2005 16:28, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
> > Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:34:55 +0300
> >
> > Also: do we need v2apps/tex/old/*.
>
> I don't know, it depends on how well are the current binaries in
> v2apps/tex/ tested.  The old ones got a lot of testing, and the only
> difference is that the new ones were built with updated v2.03 libc, so
> that they should work on Windows 2000 and XP.  If someone here uses
> the new ports and can say that they work well, the old ones can go.
>
At least I didn't succeed to build GCC documentation with newer TeX binaries 
easy enough under WinXP. That is reason why I I built gcc documentation 
archives for DJGPP  under Linux.

Andris