X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Message-ID: <424D14D4.1BFB5793@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:31:00 -0500 From: CBFalconer Organization: Ched Research http://cbfalconer.home.att.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: pruning current References: <200503311308 DOT j2VD83Fa017915 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <01c53629$Blat.v2.4$72234400 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200503311950 DOT j2VJoHBx028628 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <89rp41hl3b65bkchu9ibj44dtf9rehb53p AT 4ax DOT com> <01c5369d$Blat.v2.4$81bdeb80 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Brian Inglis >> >> This needs cross checked carefully, but these should be all the old >> revs in current that can be moved to deleted; saving a total of: >> 487467 KB > > I'm not sure what you are saying. If you mean that every package > should retain only its last version, then this is certainly not right: > we keep some old versions for a good reason. > > So here's the list of packages that I _know_ should be retained > (explanations available upon request): > > > v2gnu/em1934b.zip 1367 KB 1998-04-29 > > v2gnu/em1934d.zip 5731 KB 1997-05-03 > > v2gnu/em1934l1.zip 1400 KB 1997-10-27 > > v2gnu/em1934l2.zip 1400 KB 1997-12-29 > > v2gnu/em1934l3.zip 1338 KB 1997-10-27 > > v2gnu/em1934r1.zip 1409 KB 1997-12-29 > > v2gnu/em1934r2.zip 1412 KB 1997-10-27 > > v2gnu/em1934r3.zip 1338 KB 1997-10-27 > > v2gnu/em1934s1.zip 1419 KB 1997-12-29 > > v2gnu/em1934s2.zip 994 KB 1997-10-27 > > v2gnu/em1934s3.zip 1106 KB 1997-10-28 > > v2gnu/emacs19.README 10 KB 1998-04-29 > > v2gnu/pat21b.zip 70 KB 1996-10-19 > > v2gnu/pat21s.zip 87 KB 1996-10-19 > > I think people who ported or developed the relevant packages should > each state what versions need to be retained and which can be deleted. > It's not wise to clean-sweep the repository without asking them. I see, in DJ's list, only one version of gcc that has corresponding versions of gnat and gpc available. Those should all be retained, together with the corresponding g77 and g++. We are talking about a CD, not about destroying versions, I trust. -- "I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies." -- C. A. R. Hoare