X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <73.394b5283.2d1afdb8@aol.com> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:33:28 EST Subject: Re: isnanf et al To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_73.394b5283.2d1afdb8_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6021 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_73.394b5283.2d1afdb8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/24/2003 12:50:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il writes: > Do we have functions that go by those names? If not, removing the > definitions will leave us without this functionality, and that could > potentially break some applications out there, or even the libm > functions themselves, if some of them use those macros. > > So I'd suggest instead to replace these macros with different > definitions which do not contradict C99. > Yes, the functions are in libm.a and the prototypes are defined in math.h. --part1_73.394b5283.2d1afdb8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 12/24/2003 12:50:1= 3 AM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il writes:

Do we have functions that go b= y those names?  If not, removing the
definitions will leave us without this functionality, and that could
potentially break some applications out there, or even the libm
functions themselves, if some of them use those macros.

So I'd suggest instead to replace these macros with different
definitions which do not contradict C99.

<= BR> Yes, the functions are in libm.a and the prototypes are defined in math.h. --part1_73.394b5283.2d1afdb8_boundary--