X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: 12 Nov 2003 08:33:59 +0200
Message-Id: <ullqmccyw.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3FB15BC4.AF791F8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:59:32 +0000)
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/go32/makefile,overflow.S
References: <200311070952 DOT hA79qp0D028636 AT delorie DOT com> <3FACDD1E DOT 4950D38B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>	 <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311101328470 DOT 17387 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>	 <3FAFEC80 DOT E3DF81F8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311111046350 DOT 6448 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <3FB15BC4 DOT AF791F8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:59:32 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I like the internal functions being in sections like signal, etc., because it
> shows what part of the library they belong to.
> 
> OTOH putting them in internal makes it absolutely clear they are internal.
> 
> I have no strong opinion either way.

I have no strong opinions, either, but if we put them in internal, we
will need to make sure all the other internal functions are moved into
that node, for consistency.  Is it worth the trouble?