X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3FB15BC4.AF791F8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:59:32 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/go32/makefile,overflow.S
References: <200311070952 DOT hA79qp0D028636 AT delorie DOT com> <3FACDD1E DOT 4950D38B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	 <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311101328470 DOT 17387 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	 <3FAFEC80 DOT E3DF81F8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311111046350 DOT 6448 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Esa A E Peuha wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> > > @c ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > @node Stack overflow handler, signal
> 
> Would it be better to change "signal" to "internal", since this is not
> meant to be used directly by applications.  There's no "internal"
> category yet, but I think there should be (with more entries than just
> this one).

I like the internal functions being in sections like signal, etc., because it
shows what part of the library they belong to.

OTOH putting them in internal makes it absolutely clear they are internal.

I have no strong opinion either way.

[snip]
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.162
> > > diff -c -r1.162 wc204.txi
> > > *** wc204.txi   8 Nov 2003 12:19:40 -0000       1.162
> > > --- wc204.txi   10 Nov 2003 11:52:10 -0000
> > > ***************
> > > *** 1032,1034 ****
> > > --- 1032,1038 ----
> > >   @code{strftime} now uses the date format (for @code{%x})
> > >   and time format (for @code{%X}) from the current locale.
> > >   This means that @code{%T} and @code{%X} are no longer equivalent.
> > > +
> > > + @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip AT r{ added}
> > > + @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit AT r{ added}
> > > + The stack overflow handler was added.
> >
> > "The" -> "A"?
> 
> "A handler was added" makes me think that we may add another one some
> day, but English is not my native language, so I'll trust your opinion.

Before there was no handler, so you added "a" handler. Now that is "the"
handler.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek