X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:05:17 EDT Subject: Fwd: Bug in modfl() in libc.a To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii) CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_alt_boundary" --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I forgot to mention that my source was taken directly from the archive. KB Williams --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I forgot to mention that my source was taken directly fr= om the archive. 


KB Williams --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_alt_boundary-- --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Full-name: Kbwms Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:15:44 EDT Subject: Re: Bug in modfl() in libc.a To: eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_c1.371d570e.2caabfe0_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 --part2_c1.371d570e.2caabfe0_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli: In a message dated 9/30/2003 12:53:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il writes: > >This patch produced the following: > > > >Hunk #1 failed @ 17 > >1 out of 1 hunk failed > > Probably because of end-of-line or whitespace inconsistencies between > the original file and the patch you extracted from the mail message. > > So, what do I do now? According to `diff', the patched code and the original are identical. KB Williams --part2_c1.371d570e.2caabfe0_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eli:

In a message dated 9/30/2003 12:53:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT elta DOT co= .il writes:

>This patch produced the following:
>
>Hunk #1 failed @ 17
>1 out of 1 hunk failed

Probably because of end-of-line or whitespace inconsistencies between
the original file and the patch you extracted from the mail message.



So, what do I do now?  According to `diff', the patched code and the or= iginal are identical.


KB Williams --part2_c1.371d570e.2caabfe0_boundary-- --part1_c1.371d570e.2caacb7d_boundary--