X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: 29 Sep 2003 08:04:34 +0200
Message-Id: <u65jci0zx.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
In-reply-to: <12e.322be914.2ca8a773@aol.com> (Kbwms@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Integrating K. B. Williams's maths functions
References:  <12e DOT 322be914 DOT 2ca8a773 AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:06:59 EDT
> >
> > I think when these functions are part of libc.a, we should remove the
> > ones in libm.a.
> 
> The point is that neither library has a nan() function that meets C99
> specifications -- namely that the C99 functions take a calling-sequence
> parameter whereas the current ones to not.  What should we do about that?

I thought Richard wrote a version of `nan' that does suppport C99's
semantics.