X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <8.3cc78780.2c9647f5@aol.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:38:45 EDT Subject: Re: Bug in log10l in libstdcxx.a To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_8.3cc78780.2c9647f5_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_8.3cc78780.2c9647f5_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Recently, I reported a problem with long double function log10l. Today, I thought it might be interesting to see how the functions in library libstdcxx.a fared under our test regime as compared to our own functions. Our functions: Tested 87912 functions, 251 errors detected Functions from libstdcxx.a: Tested 87912 functions, 5260 errors detected KB Williams --part1_8.3cc78780.2c9647f5_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Recently, I reported a problem with long double function= log10l.  Today, I thought it might be interesting to see how the funct= ions in library libstdcxx.a fared under our test regime as compared to our o= wn functions.

Our functions:
Tested 87912 functions, 251 errors detected

Functions from libstdcxx.a:
Tested 87912 functions, 5260 errors detected


KB Williams --part1_8.3cc78780.2c9647f5_boundary--