Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:12:55 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Melvin Curran" <Melvin AT HME DOT Ltd DOT uk>
Message-Id: <7458-Tue02Sep2003201254+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <F1A9C8D7A58D1B45A9C16FE7E3DA83D7021890@server.HME.hme.ltd.uk>
	(Melvin AT HME DOT Ltd DOT uk)
Subject: Re: Non-compliant strxfrm
References:  <F1A9C8D7A58D1B45A9C16FE7E3DA83D7021890 AT server DOT HME DOT hme DOT ltd DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:36:13 +0100
> From: "Melvin Curran" <Melvin AT HME DOT Ltd DOT uk>
> 
> In that case, a couple of minor changes to the function and we are
> left with the function below.

Thanks, but I think this needs some further work, since this fragment:

     if (--n)
       *dst++ = c;

seems to dereference dst even if n is zero.  The standard forbids
that, see our prior discussions in this thread.