Date: 02 Sep 2003 07:52:23 +0200
Message-Id: <uznhnzqi0.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <1a5.18a6e270.2c853164@aol.com> (Kbwms@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Bug in log10l in libstdcxx.a
References:  <1a5 DOT 18a6e270 DOT 2c853164 AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:33:56 EDT
> >
> > Sounds like it's not our problem, then.  If you want to pursue this,
> > see http://gcc.gnu.org/ for bug reporting instructions.
> 
> My only concern is that our users know about the problem.  I've been finding
> bugs in glibc-2.3.2 C code and that's a lot more fun that trying to wander
> through the gnu.org tangle.

The only way our users will have the problem corrected is if it gets
reported as per gcc.gnu.org instructions.  So please do consider
reporting that bug.  Thanks in advance.