From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <154.23e43a2e.2c850911@aol.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:41:53 EDT Subject: Re: Bug in log10l in libstdcxx.a To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_154.23e43a2e.2c850911_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_154.23e43a2e.2c850911_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/1/2003 4:07:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, dj AT delorie DOT com writes: > libstdcxx.a is not part of djgpp itself, but is ported from gcc. > Could you check the versions (if any) in libc.a and libm.a? If those > work, it's a gcc (libstdc++) bug. > There are no versions of log10l() anywhere else in the lib directory. --part1_154.23e43a2e.2c850911_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 9/1/2003 4:07:16 PM Eastern Standard=20= Time, dj AT delorie DOT com writes:

libstdcxx.a is not part of djgpp itself, but is ported from= gcc.
Could you check the versions (if any) in libc.a and libm.a? If those work, it's a gcc (libstdc++) bug.

There are no versions of log10l() anywhere else in the lib directory.= --part1_154.23e43a2e.2c850911_boundary--