Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:44:31 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <9743-Sat30Aug2003204430+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3F50B64F.F5AC9380@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:35:59 +0100)
Subject: Re: <math.h> and <libm/math.h>
References: <1cd DOT fda5102 DOT 2c7e5b12 AT aol DOT com> <3F50B64F DOT F5AC9380 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:35:59 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I think we can assume standard C for DJGPP.

Yes.

> Why don't we move everything from <libm/math.h> into <math.h> and make
> <libm/math.h> just include <math.h>?

That's what I suggested the other day.