From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <19a.198b74dd.2c7e99ea@aol.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:34:02 EDT Subject: Re: Arithmetic Exceptions in C99 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_19a.198b74dd.2c7e99ea_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_19a.198b74dd.2c7e99ea_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/27/2003 5:42:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il writes: > >Question: Has it already been decided that DJGPP will be IEC 60559 > >compliant (that is, comply with Annex F)? > Where can a copy of IEC 60559 be obtained? KB Williams --part1_19a.198b74dd.2c7e99ea_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/27/2003 5:42:11 PM Eastern Standard= Time, eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il writes:

>Question: Has it already been decided that DJGPP will b= e IEC 60559
>compliant (that is, comply with Annex F)?


Where can a copy of IEC 60559 be obtained?


KB Williams --part1_19a.198b74dd.2c7e99ea_boundary--