From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <16c.231ddba4.2c7e5c77@aol.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:11:51 EDT Subject: Re: Arithmetic Exceptions in C99 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_16c.231ddba4.2c7e5c77_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_16c.231ddba4.2c7e5c77_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/27/2003 2:49:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes: > > I have problems understanding how "raising an exception" can be > setting a bit somewhere and not calling raise(). > > You are correct. Setting a bit somewhere does not raise the exception; that must be done separately -- in the new regime by calling feraiseexcept(). --part1_16c.231ddba4.2c7e5c77_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/27/2003 2:49:16 PM Eastern Standard= Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes:


I have problems understanding how "raising an exception" can be
setting a bit somewhere and not calling raise().



You are correct.  Setting a bit somewhere does not raise the exception;= that must be done separately -- in the new regime by calling feraiseexcept(= ). --part1_16c.231ddba4.2c7e5c77_boundary--