From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <194.1d9c9240.2c77bb75@aol.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:31:17 EDT Subject: Re: Arithmetic Exceptions in C99 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_194.1d9c9240.2c77bb75_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6011 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_194.1d9c9240.2c77bb75_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:41:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes: > I think they specifically point out that because if you round you are > making the result inexact (so an inexact exception is plausible), but > as you are asking for rounding you should not get that exception in > this case. > Very interesting. Can you provide text or a reference? --part1_194.1d9c9240.2c77bb75_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:41:28 PM Eastern Standard= Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes:

I think they specifically point out that because if you rou= nd you are
making the result inexact (so an inexact exception is plausible), but
as you are asking for rounding you should not get that exception in
this case.


Very interesting.  Can you provide text or a reference? --part1_194.1d9c9240.2c77bb75_boundary--