From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b@aol.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:22:19 EDT Subject: Re: Arithmetic Exceptions in C99 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6011 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:41:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes: > Is that from the real C99 or from the draft you refer to below as C99? > It's the Draft version of C99. Do you have a copy of the real C99 or a compendium of the changes? --part1_148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:41:28 PM Eastern Standard= Time, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se writes:

Is that from the real C99 or from the draft you refer to be= low as C99?

It's the Draft version of C99.= Do you have a copy of the real C99 or a compendium of the changes? --part1_148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b_boundary--