Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:01:27 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id: <2427-Tue12Aug2003090127+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, AndrewCottrell AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au
In-reply-to: <3F3802C8.7B64C4F9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:55:36 +0100)
Subject: Re: inode problem in `rm'
References: <000001c35f0a$9d510470$0101a8c0 AT acp42g> <uptjcsoh1 DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3F3802C8 DOT 7B64C4F9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:55:36 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I wonder if the 'rm' code actually calls fstat on an a directory file
> descriptor, though. It doesn't sound like it.

Exactly.