From: "Andrew Cottrell" <AndrewCottrell AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: GCC 3.3 & LIBC - build process change (attempt #2)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:03:03 +1000
Message-ID: <000001c34cf2$43516430$0101a8c0@acp42g>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3F16ED96.E6D64B20@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h6I63hB19161
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Looks good, apart from:
> 
[snip]
> You can use sed's -f option multiple times. Below is with sed 3.0.28:
[snip]
 
> bash-2.04$ echo -e "foo\nbar\nbaz" | sed -f t.sed -f t2.sed
[snip]
The attempt 2 line was :-

+ XNOPGGPP = $(CROSS_GCC) $(shell sed -f $(TOP)/../noprofpp.sed
$(TOP)/../gcc.opt) -I. -I- -isystem $(TOP)/../../include $(CFLAGS)

How about the following line?
XNOPGGPP = $(CROSS_GCC) $(shell sed -f $(TOP)/../noprof.sed -f
$(TOP)/../gpp_opt.sed $(TOP)/../gcc.opt) -I. -I- -isystem
$(TOP)/../../include $(CFLAGS)
 
If I do this then no separate C++ profiling sed file is required. Is this
better? If it is okay then I can change the gpp_opt.sed to gpp.sed and
produce an attempt #3. Third time lucky???

> Actually, why don't you use gpp.opt in XNOPGGPP instead of 
> gcc.opt? 
I thought that as GCC 3.3 needs a separate C++ and C option list then in the
future there may need to be a separate profiling list for C++ and C.

>Then you wouldn't need noprofpp.sed. I guess your 
> solution allows us to cope with C &
> C++ having different profiling options, but is that likely?
I don't think so and there is only one file.

> I'd also prefer the name gpp.sed to gpp_opt.sed, but that's 
> really picky, so feel free to ignore me there. ;)

I don't care about the name, so long as the process is okay.

Andrew