Message-ID: <000d01c33dd4$0aead8b0$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
References: <002201c337b1$b3fdce40$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EFD7884 DOT EE47DD65 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <001601c33d70$8431e600$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EFDBA3D DOT 3F35406B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: Re: LIBC C files patches to build with GCC 3.3 (non math files)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:19:00 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Do you have a patch for strtof too (src/libc/c99/stdlib/strtof.c)?
> > No.  The patch to get GCC 3.3 to build I thought was big enough and I
didn't
> > want to include anything else in it.
> [snip]
>
> strtof needs some "type-punning" fixes too. It does not compile for me
with
> gcc 3.3. Well, not the pre-release of gcc I am using. strtof.c has no
> modifications - it's vanilla CVS.

I double checked and I missed including this one in my patch zip file. It's
marked in WinCVS as being changed. Must have completly missed this one due
to the number of files being changed.

I have uploaded the updated zip to clio just before I hit the send button on
this email.

Andrew