Message-ID: <002001c337f0$0d2a4aa0$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
References: <200306211133 DOT h5LBXlpl002656 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: LIBM patch for GCC 3.3 - math changes
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:24:23 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > + typedef union
> > + {
> > +   float f;
> > +   long  l;
> > + } _float_long_union;
>
> Why aren't you using float_t here?

The math code uses float (doesn't use float_t) and I thought that this may
be the most appropriate place to put this union as the math code in allot of
the places has ieee prefixes in the function names.

If this is wrong then please let me know where I should put the definition.

Thanks,
Andrew