Message-ID: <009101c337c5$68daa370$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <200306201334 DOT h5KDYMWU012441 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <000e01c337aa$7b238800$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EF3E113 DOT 1C8C9C2B AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: LIBM patch for GCC 3.3 - math changes
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 17:19:09 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

..SNIP..
> I don't know the details of this, so I may be talking nonsense,
> but it reminds me of what I found in looking at the present
> memalign.c.  That uses a herd of macros which do not appear in the
> source, nor in malloc.h.  This makes the source unreadable,
> without long and possibly fruitless searches through stdlib.h.
> So, while there may be prototypes for the source routines buried
> in this manner, there should not be references IMO.

There are no macros in the changes. For details on these changes please do a
search for GCC 3.3 for the last two months and you see that these are needed
in order for GCC 3.3 changes that cause LIBC to fail to build.

Andrew