Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:39:59 -0400
Message-Id: <200306111639.h5BGdxrf027585@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200306111121.49638.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:21:49 +0300)
Subject: Re: Binutils bug causes GCC bootstrap comparision failures
References: <200306052334 DOT 12918 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200306052058 DOT h55KwFM6020876 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200306111121 DOT 49638 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Maybe we should consider this or something similar for DJGPP port of binutils.

It would be better in the long run if we could fix (er, hack) fseek
itself in libc.  I did that for cygwin, so I can explain the logic if
someone wants to volunteer.