Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:55:16 -0400
Message-Id: <200305072055.h47KtG6q010180@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200305072355.16047.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Wed, 7 May 2003 23:55:15 +0300)
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: SIGILL 386 (illegal opcode)
References: <200305071759 DOT h47HxQte028947 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200305072355 DOT 16047 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Problems with atomicity.h were recently discussed in gcc mailing
> lists. Don't expect enything done with gcc-3.2.X. Let's see how it
> will be in gcc-3.3 when it will be released (don't ask dates, I
> don't know)

It pre-released this week.  Too late to fix bugs, but not too soon to
start building/testing it.