From: Message-Id: <200305061759.h46HxXht018427@speedy.ludd.luth.se> Subject: Re: Yet another try on nan in strto{f,d,ld} In-Reply-To: <3405-Tue06May2003193807+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> "from Eli Zaretskii at May 6, 2003 07:38:08 pm" To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:59:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk According to Eli Zaretskii: > > From: > > Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 21:48:01 +0200 (CEST) > > > > A:\>ts3 > > FPU CW: 0x00000340. > > float tests: > > Exiting due to signal SIGFPE > > Floating Point exception at eip=00005e21, x87 status=b1a0 > > eax=000917ac ebx=00092c2b ecx=0000000c edx=00090f40 esi=000918ad edi=00000006 > > ebp=0009171c esp=00091718 program=A:\TS3.EXE > > cs: sel=00bf base=00116000 limit=0009ffff > > ds: sel=00c7 base=00116000 limit=0009ffff > > es: sel=00c7 base=00116000 limit=0009ffff > > fs: sel=009f base=000051d0 limit=0000ffff > > gs: sel=00d7 base=00000000 limit=0010ffff > > ss: sel=00c7 base=00116000 limit=0009ffff > > App stack: [00092dc4..00012dc4] Exceptn stack: [00012d44..00010e04] > > > > Call frame traceback EIPs: > > 0x00005e21 __modfl+33, file a:/doprnt.c, line 924 > > Any clues why does it say that __modfl+33 is in doprnt.c? Is that a > bug in symify/bfdsymify? Line 924 is the last line of doprnt.c and modfl() wasn't compiled with debug information. It's like when only t-strtof.c was compile with debug info. Then the printf/doprnt stuff was attributed to t-strtof.c. That's my guess. Or perhaps you mean it should detect that the file is irrelevant and shouldn't map to doprnt.c? Feedback on the other questions another day. Right, MartinS