Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 13:24:12 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar
Message-Id: <7458-Tue06May2003132411+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3EB673E1.7000603@inti.gov.ar> (message from Salvador Eduardo
	Tropea on Mon, 05 May 2003 11:23:29 -0300)
Subject: Re: 2.04 alpha success, small details
References:  <3EB673E1 DOT 7000603 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 11:23:29 -0300
> From: Salvador Eduardo Tropea <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
> 
>   The binutils docs seems to be incomplete (.info files are there but
> .info* files aren't).

Are we distributing binutils docs with djdev?  I didn't think so.

>   I found that __attribute__((constructor)) doesn't work for
> gcc 3.2.2 for C++ code

Does it work in C programs?