Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 06:27:33 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-Id: <9003-Mon05May2003062733+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3EB54C91.6420F0C5@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Sun, 04 May 2003 18:23:29 +0100) Subject: Re: uname and Athlons [PATCH] References: <7704-Sat03May2003220736+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EB54C91 DOT 6420F0C5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 18:23:29 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > > > If we are going to support this, then please consider reusing some of > > the code I wrote for GDB to get a much finer details about the CPU > > make and type. It's in go32-nat.c:go32_sysinfo. > > Do we actually need to make all those distinctions? I don't know; I was just pointing out some additional code you could use. > GDB is licensed under the GNU GPL. Presumably we could use your code, because > the FSF has licensed it back to you as part of the copyright assignment > process? It's my code, so I can give it away to anyone on any terms I like, even if I already gave it to someone else on their terms.