Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 11:30:14 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <9743-Sat03May2003113013+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <3EB372C3.451554C9@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Sat, 03 May 2003 03:41:55 -0400) Subject: Re: nmalloc documentation revisions References: <3EAF5020 DOT 9E3C6C9A AT yahoo DOT com> <7458-Wed30Apr2003210444+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EB08219 DOT 3D55D32A AT yahoo DOT com> <3EB1555C DOT D52AC0B6 AT yahoo DOT com> <3EB2B5C0 DOT 987AC700 AT yahoo DOT com> <2110-Sat03May2003004811+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EB2F494 DOT 5CDF344B AT yahoo DOT com> <3EB372C3 DOT 451554C9 AT yahoo DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 03:41:55 -0400 > From: CBFalconer > > Results on: > > > > with a 2003-05-03 date. Now can I relax? I guess we should now wait for Richard to have enough time to include this in the next alpha. Thanks.