Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:34:55 +0300 (EET DST)
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djtar and slightly weirdly formatted ZIPs [PATCH]
In-Reply-To: <3EB22335.A1182821@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.51.0305021420280.25146@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References: <E199Nch-0000l9-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
 <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0304301442320 DOT 5104 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
 <3EB22335 DOT A1182821 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2 May 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:

> I could make the code ignore temporary spanning markers, but generate an error
> when it sees other header types before the local header. At the moment it
> could ignore headers that are important. Do we want it to be strict or behave
> like Info-Zip's unzip?

I think it's better to be strict, since we don't know what headers may be
generated by future versions of PKZIP.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/