From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10305010012.AA19454@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: nmalloc documentation revisions
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:12:15 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <200304302032.h3UKW5pT018787@speedy.ludd.luth.se> from "ams@ludd.luth.se" at Apr 30, 2003 10:32:05 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> This is to CBFalconer, and other potential patch posters:
> FWIW, I agree. There were many changes in the first blocks that were
> only white-space changes so I didn't bother to look further. I almost
> did. But then real-world intruded. Sorry.

If they are only whitespace changes, I'd suggest sending diffs with
the -w switch.