Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3EAB995F.273750D6@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 09:48:31 +0100 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DJGPP workers CC: Ben Peddell Subject: Re: Bug 00314 -- div() still broken References: <3e9c6920$0$21928$afc38c87@> <3EA5477F DOT 2020901 AT cyberoptics DOT com> <3ea85d95$0$12489$4c41069e AT reader1 DOT ash DOT ops DOT us DOT uu DOT net> <3ea97d4c$0$19415$4c41069e AT reader1 DOT ash DOT ops DOT us DOT uu DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Ben Peddell wrote: [snip] > GCC 3.2.1 has -fpcc-struct-return by default in DJGPP, whilst GCC > 3.2.2 has -freg-struct-return by default in DJGPP. > GCC 3.2.2 may need to be configured to make -fpcc-struct-return the > default, to maintain compatibility with the DJGPP 2.03 libraries. Or, > the libraries may need to be re-compiled for GCC 3.2.2, and marked as such. > > These options are in `info gcc "Invoking GCC" "Code Gen Options"' Thanks for investigating this, Ben. I can't believe they changed this in a point release. I thought 3.x was supposed to have a stable ABI! I think we should add -fpcc-struct-return to the default compiler options for DJGPP libc's sources. Some people are probably still using gcc 2.95.x. I can't really blame them, given gcc 3.x's guess-which-ABI-we're-using-now problems. We should remain binarily compatible across several gcc versions 2.04 alpha 1 was compiled with gcc 3.2.2, so I'll mention that it probably only works with 3.2.2 in the announcement. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]