Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:17:00 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se
Message-Id: <2110-Sat26Apr2003201700+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200304261342.h3QDgHZc016946@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
	(ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se)
Subject: Re: t-strtof discrepancies
References:  <200304261342 DOT h3QDgHZc016946 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:42:17 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> I'm not sure you got my point. (Or I'm misunderstanding you.) It's not
> the difference in the nth digit that is problem. The problem is that
> with emulation a different number is displayed then with no
> emulation.

Sorry, that was my misunderstanding then.

> E. g. Test 12 above shows 6.87747e-39 with emulation and 2e-39
> without

Sounds like a serious bug in the emulator, something that should be
fixed, IMHO.