Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:56:31 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id: <1527-Wed23Apr2003125630+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3EA548ED.388F2546@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:51:41 +0100)
Subject: Re: fstat, fd_props and inventing inodes, revision 3 [PATCH]
References: <E196rAk-0007Mp-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <003101c30704$8dbb1ea0$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <000a01c30708$aacbc680$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EA2685E DOT 725043BC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <8296-Sun20Apr2003135633+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EA2B7E2 DOT E83694EA AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1858-Sun20Apr2003203205+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EA43D71 DOT F34E91EC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7443-Tue22Apr2003103725+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EA548ED DOT 388F2546 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:51:41 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> It does seem to scale approximately linearly, but that's because it's spending
> most (> 95%) of its time calling __dpmi_int.
> 
> I don't think the call takes long enough, to worry about it.

Yes, I agree, given the results.  Thanks again for testing.