From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10304230447.AA18637@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: dxe review
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:47:21 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: dborca AT yahoo DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3EA5CD9C.741DEA9D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Apr 23, 2003 12:17:48 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I've just taken a look at the code. I looked at this particular version of the
> ZIP:
> -rw-rw-r--    1 rich     rich        61522 Apr 20 22:54

OK most recent.

> I have some comments on specific files:

All good comments.  I'll plow through as many as possible before I check
the first version in.  Documentation fixes are really low risk so I'll
do them first.

In some cases the choice of routines was made so the code is compatible
with V2.03 - and in some cases the routines were chosen to minimize the
code footprint size (allows non-heroic ways to make libc dynamic without
needing most of libc to load itself).